DRAFT

Puzzling Through My Fiction

Photo
Credit Nicolas Ménard and Xavier Sailliol

When I was growing up, crossword puzzles were — along with watching Ken Burns movies and eating lox — among the unfathomable pleasures of grown-ups. My grandmother would sit in her den for hours, the puzzle in her lap, looking blankly around the room as if she had just read a piece of news whose enormity she could scarcely comprehend. Other adults would periodically drift by to offer their condolences (“A nine-letter religious figure, hmm…”) and I would stare from the rug in disbelieving boredom.

My conversion to a crossword puzzler, then — and not just any puzzler, but one who has favorite puzzle makers, and who occasionally snorts audibly at especially clever clues — has required a bit of an inner adjustment. To my 10-year-old self I can say only: Forgive me. And perhaps more defensibly: Crossword puzzles turn out to be great practice for one of the few endeavors that both of us can respect — fiction writing.

I say this not because of puzzles’ supposed mind-sharpening powers or their vocabulary-building benefits (there are whole reams of words — METE, TYRO, EWER — that I have never used anywhere but in a crossword puzzle). For me the value in puzzling lies deeper than that. A crossword may seem meaningless, but to the hapless writer it can provide a crucial map of the strange terrain of his chosen profession. The crossword-puzzling fiction writer may struggle (in fact, he will certainly struggle), but he will not despair. Here are some of the landmarks he’ll encounter: Read more…

Writing Books Very Few Will Read

Authors ­are often asked where they get their ideas. As a writer for hire, my answer owes something to the songwriter Sammy Cahn. Asked which came first, the music or the lyrics, he said: “The phone call.”

One morning that call came from a rabbi in the Midwest who knew of my work as a ghostwriter. He asked if I had any interest in writing a memoir with the patriarch of a prominent and philanthropic family. There was a twist: This book would never be published.

It took time to absorb the oddness of the question. Was I really willing to write a book that wouldn’t be seen (let alone read) by anyone I knew, or anyone who might want to hire me in the future? And was I prepared to forgo royalties, reviews and the assorted social and economic benefits that authors like to dream about and sometimes even experience? The client’s family had an excellent reputation, so I flew out to see him. Read more…

The Plagiarism Jitters

A few years ago, I went out for a night at the opera, right after approving a book review I had written that would soon be sent to the printer, posted on the Internet and generally released into the world.

I had conscientiously checked and rechecked all the places where I had quoted the book, to make sure that the author’s wording and the punctuation were correct. And then I did my usual last-minute agonizing over some awkward phrases of my own. The job was done. As I settled into my balcony seat, and the lights went down, I was running through those now very familiar paragraphs in my mind, saying goodbye to them, letting them go. Read more…

Reading With Imagination

“Reading,” Jean-Paul Sartre writes in his essay “What Is Literature?,” “is a pact of generosity between author and reader. Each one trusts the other; each one counts on the other, demands of the other as much as he demands of himself.” Literature, he maintains, is a shared experience, and a literary work’s reception and success is integral to it. “What the writer requires of the reader is not the application of an abstract freedom but the gift of his whole person, with his passions, his prepossessions, his sympathies, his sexual temperament, and his scale of values.”

Every author, he believes, constructs his work from notions about the implied or potential reader; in other words, in choosing his reader, the author chooses his subject. Thus, since in Sartre’s view a literary work is a such close collaboration between writer and reader, it must necessarily follow that a “good” reader produces “good” literature while a “bad” one, “bad” books. “The bad novel,” Sartre writes, “aims to please by flattering, whereas the good one is an exigence and an act of faith.”

Reading, Sartre goes on to say, is predicated on personal concerns and experiences and there is no such thing as a totally objective reader, a tabula rasa without tastes, opinions, loves. It is certain that the “The Aeneid” got a different reading (hearing?) in Virgil’s time than it does today. Equally, a Nabokov scholar and a family therapist would read “Lolita” quite differently, neither of them being right or wrong. It is not, then, the different textual interpretations that are at stake — the more the merrier, in fact — but instead it is the approach to the act of reading that matters. This approach does not rely on the tastes or the qualifications of particular readers — the feminists, the Tea Party members, the liberals — but rather on how exactly people read. Read more…

Writing My Way to a New Self

Photo
Credit Vivienne Flesher

I stared at the head counselor with a mixture of defiance, annoyance and heartbreak. She had just informed me that she was demoting me. Gone was the prestige position of senior counselor for a group of 13-year-old girls, and in its place, a midlevel position as a co-counselor for a group of 11-year-olds.

“I just don’t understand it,” she said. “In your letter you seemed like a completely different person.”

Of course I’d been a different person in my letter. I’d been writing.

I’d written a letter that spring, back in my dorm room at college, explaining in detail why I wanted to return as a counselor to the camp that had tortured me as a camper. Though I can no longer remember the details of the handwritten letter, I’m sure I said something about how I knew I hadn’t been a model camper, but that I wanted the chance to try again. I wanted to be there for other campers who were like me: bookish, semi-artsy and inexplicably at a summer camp for athletes. I could teach dance, I wrote. I could teach writing, not that the camp offered such a thing. I’d be there for the girls who were struggling; I’d help them have the sparkling summer I’d never found for myself. But mostly what my letter said, I’m certain, was that I was excited and ready to be an exceptional camp counselor.

So the head counselor had been surprised to discover upon my arrival in New Hampshire that I was still the same mildly morose, shy and apathetic person she’d known me to be as a camper. I still didn’t cheer appropriately at soccer games. I still felt like an impostor when singing the camp songs. Camp spirit was still a mortifying concept for me.

“What happened to that girl who wrote the letter?” she asked.

She’s in here, I wanted to respond. But she only comes out when I’m writing. You thought you were hiring Writing Me. But instead what you got was Actual Me. Big mistake. Read more…

Past Imperfect: Lives in the Biographer’s Mirror

“Life,” Soren Kierkegaard observed, “can only be understood backwards; but it must be lived forwards.” At first glance, that observation would seem to accord biographers of departed souls an advantage denied their works’ subjects.

To wit, unlike memoirists, the author chronicling someone else’s life after it’s over enjoys the luxury of knowing how everything turned out, as well as the advantage of distance. It thus follows that once that biographer has completed the research and written the biography — Voilà ! — here is the life story captured between two hard-bound covers.

Would that it were that simple!

The problem begins with “the life story,” the notion that any life is reducible to a single tale. There is no “the life story.” All individual lives entail many stories, and the biographer must choose which to tell. Consider your own life: Ponder the most obvious milestones by which lives are parsed — graduations, new homes and cities, weddings, jobs, births and deaths, illnesses, memorable trips.

Do such events in your life truly trace all of the signal, dramatic turns — what screenwriters call the “plot points” — of that life? Think, too, about your own résumé or, for that matter, if you have one, your Facebook timeline. How useful a guide would those be for a biographer intending to comprehend your life? Do they fully record all of the key forces, people and events that have shaped your works and days? Read more…

A Poet’s Boyhood at the Burning Crossroads

The year I started writing poems, I dreamed about chains dragging along a dusty country road. It was June 1998, six months before my 13th birthday. Earlier that evening, my mother and I watched, encased in a heavy silence, as the local news station reported on the murder of James Byrd Jr. in Jasper, Tex.

Byrd, a black man, had accepted a ride home from three white men. They later beat him, chained him to the back of their truck and dragged him more than three miles. The word “dismembered” entered my vocabulary that night, lodging itself in my throat. Jasper is just a four-hour drive from Lewisville, where we lived. After the report, the newscaster moved on to the next story, but I could not. How old were you when America taught you that being who you are could get you killed?

I was the kind of boy who collected semiprecious stones and kept a telescope by my bedroom window. A book of Greek mythology “for children” was always just an arm’s reach from my bed, next to a notebook of, well, not poems exactly, just stray phrases I’d jot down when I was tired of repeating them to myself. The night of the news report, instead of going to my notebook, I dug through my rock collection until I found my piece of jasper. The stone was smooth to the touch and rust red, the color of dried blood.

The pages of that blue notebook are most telling in the silences. I didn’t write about Byrd because a sense of peril had turned my thoughts into invisible ink.

Photo
A basket of flowers hung from the fence where Matthew Shepard was tied and left for dead.Credit Steve Liss/The LIFE Images Collection, via Getty Images

That October, my mother and I watched a news report about a young gay man who had been beaten, tied to a fence and left for dead in Laramie, Wyo. In the way that anyone in the closet recognizes shards of their self reflected in the lives of other gay people, I knew Matthew Shepard without knowing him. For as long as I could remember, the word “sissy” had chased me, hissing.

This time, though, I felt alone in a way I hadn’t when I had learned about James Byrd Jr. Worried that even expressing concern about Shepard’s murder would give me away as being gay, too, I walked out of the room as if I was bored. Even then, I had refined the art of distancing myself from myself.

I went to my room that night and grabbed my notebook. There was no one moment in which I was suddenly able to shatter silence into language. That night, like so many nights that have followed, was about the attempt — in spite of all of my fears — to try again anyway.

With time, the stray lines I wrote began to collect like raindrops forming small bodies of water. Soon they became poems. Sad, rough little poems written in the voices of lonely, mythic people. I was drawn to myth, I think, because it seemed so distant from the reality of my life and anxieties. No scrawled poems about the boys I dreamed of kissing and holding. Rather than writing in my own voice, I mostly chose to write poems in the voices of characters. As Medusa, I wrote about refusing to look at myself in the mirror, lest my self-portrait become a suicide in stone. As Penelope, I wrote about dreaming of my husband’s body, years crashing between us like waves.

I didn’t have to be afraid of my yearning on the page because I could tell myself, the poem wasn’t really about me. Any voice but my own; any place but here.

In retrospect, it’s easy for me to pick up on echoes of my voice in these women’s voices. The poems were almost always about the tangled knot of gender, sex and desire. How telling that, at the same time, when I dreamed about having sex with boys, I dreamed I had the body of a beautiful girl. Occasionally, I’d write a poem in the second person. “You” felt like playing with fire, but “I” felt like staring at the sun itself; too glaring for me to look at directly.

The process of writing poems felt like a reprieve. Concentrating so intensely on one word and then another and another took me away; so far away, in fact, that sometimes after I finished a poem, I’d sit up at my desk, a bit dizzy. It’d been a blur. What a gift: being able to disappear without going anywhere at all.

A couple of years later, the high school theater department performed “The Laramie Project” for the entire school during a midday assembly. I sat in the audience, rigid and nervous, among my classmates. The play about the aftermath of Shepard’s murder unfolded one heart-shattering monologue at a time. A few girls cried during the play. I envied them and how easily they breathed.

I wanted to be on that stage, speaking words I still didn’t feel safe enough to say on my own, even in the privacy of my notebook. By then, my feelings about Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. had mixed, blurred and melded into a cautionary tale replaying on a loop in my mind: Being black can get you killed. Being gay can get you killed. Being a black gay boy is practically a death wish. The thought was as exhausting as it was unrelenting. I’d started having panic attacks, usually at home in my room. Once, my mother found me rocking back and forth, apologizing over and over again to my empty bedroom.

It would be some time before I read or understood the concept of the personal being political, but when your identity is stretched across the burning crossroads, I suppose in a way you always know. Stumbling through the process of writing those poems in my notebooks, I was just trying to breathe with both lungs, but the journey was political all the same.

It can’t be a coincidence that I started writing poems — bad ones, to my mind, but poems nonetheless — in the first person the same year I started coming out to close friends. Maybe every poem I have ever written has been a way of saying “I am here.” I kept reading, and eventually found my way to the work of other gay black men who were also writing their way into the world. I am here because James Baldwin, Essex Hemphill and Reginald Shepherd have been here. I am here because E. Patrick Johnson, Jericho Brown and Rickey Laurentiis are here still.

When I first read Toni Morrison’s Nobel address and came across the following sentence, I exhaled and copied it into my notebook for safekeeping: “What it is to live at the edge of towns that cannot bear your company.” The edge is where Byrd and Shepard lived and died; the edge is where so many of us continue to live and witness and struggle onward.

I continue to write about life on that edge; the crossroads, the alleyways, the underground rivers. Poetry has become a terrain on which I feel brave enough to witness history and fashion words and images into a response. Sometimes I have more questions than answers, but, at least now, I always have my words. Without fail, after I’ve finished a poem (or when a poem has decided it is finished with me), I feel just a little more fully realized: a man coming into complete and vivid focus.

Saeed Jones, a recipient of the Pushcart Prize and the editor of BuzzFeed LGBT, is the author of the poetry collection “Prelude to Bruise.”

Writing to the Beat

Rhythm has informed my writing from as early as I can remember. It all began with the beat.

My mother says I played drums prenatally, using the inside of her belly as my bass drum. This is not extraordinary in and of itself, as many mothers will attest, but Mom maintains my kicks came in rock-steady 4/4 time — with a syncopated backbeat.

I went on to play drums with dedicated passion. I took my first lessons in second grade when the sticks were longer than my forearms. I made the New Jersey high school all-state orchestra, captained the Rutgers University marching band drum line, gigged with a jazz trio through college and a blues band after graduation and continue to play with bands to this day as an avocation. Read more…

Peering Into the Darkness

It was warm for October so I went for a long ride to nowhere on my motorcycle, a seven-year-old Triumph Bonneville. I turned back for home when the sky was the color of marigolds, dead leaves whisking across the road in my wake, and in the peaceful light of dusk, I had a perfectly natural thought: What if a bat hit me in the face right now? What if my visor dropped, trapping it inside my helmet, shrilling and biting? What if I went off the road and snapped my back and was left paralyzed, out of sight down the embankment, with a dying bat in my helmet, its wings shattered, its claws scrabbling, the little white staples of its teeth sinking into me?

I wasn’t kidding when I said this was a perfectly natural thought. It is. For me. Read more…

On Not Writing

I started writing this essay five years ago, and then I stopped. That I was not able to finish the piece did not strike me at the time as ironic but as further proof that whatever I once had in me — juice, talent, will — was gone. In any case, completing it would have made moot the very point I was attempting to make: Not writing can be good for one’s writing; indeed, it can make one a better writer.

I hadn’t given up writing deliberately, and I cannot pinpoint a particular day when my not-writing period started, any more than one can say the moment when one is overtaken by sleep: It’s only after you wake that you realize how long you were out. Nor did I feel blocked at first. Lines would come to me then slip away, like a dog that loses interest in how you are petting it and seeks another hand. This goes both ways. When I lost interest in them, the lines gradually stopped coming. Before I knew it, two years had passed with scarcely a word. Read more…