|
|
|
George at Chifor Racing rant
- Thread starter Iceman
- Start date
+1 The guy sells overpriced crap that usually other people will sell it for a fraction of his prices. It's hilarious when you see his used parts prices being higher than they were new! I guess if he touches the parts they become memorabilia and the price shoots up
You can get your own for a lot cheaper than that as long as you only plan to keep it on display. http://modelkits123.com.au/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=13_15&products_id=18692
XenoVibe
Well-known member
Sounds like he doesn't know the difference between "Rare" and "Valuable." There was a beater 3 years ago auctioned for $2800 ..
http://raresportbikesforsale.com/little-gamma-suzuki-rg250-walter-wolf/
http://raresportbikesforsale.com/little-gamma-suzuki-rg250-walter-wolf/
Meh, I happen to like 944's and last time I talked to my guy in the US that I buy parts from and needed some used parts he told me he might need awhile to find the used parts because he just scrapped 3 warehouses worth. Sad to me to see these cars go to scrap but such is life.
Dirty Frank
Well-known member
A rant about marius should all be in all caps
folks that know avoid him like the plague
folks that know avoid him like the plague
N3WMAN
Well-known member
I'll just leave this here...
https://www.omvic.on.ca/portal/Portals/0/pdf/dealer_standard/Dealer_Standard_2013_Spring.pdf
https://www.omvic.on.ca/portal/Portals/0/pdf/dealer_standard/Dealer_Standard_2013_Spring.pdf
Iceman
Well-known member
vociferous
Well-known member
is it really curbsiding, if you sell a bike in individual parts (reciepts for each part), but you just happen to still have the bike assembled? and include an ownership?
The problem is that it is the government that's stealing from people in the first place by charging a fee (tax) on a privately owned item that has been legitimately paid for by the original owner.
Always looking for new sources of revenue (such as HST that we sheep agree to pay), they never look for money saving instead.
Always looking for new sources of revenue (such as HST that we sheep agree to pay), they never look for money saving instead.
Once you include the ownership, you're selling the bike as a vehicle and not as parts.
Can't you just sell the frame and ownership? Or would that single part qualify you as a curbsider?
You mean adjust the budget to spend only what comes in? Wouldn't you need all government people to agree on that? With free money pouring in and more for the taking, that does not meet reality test.
|
|
|
|
|