Jerry Amernic’s Weblog

December 29, 2009

Crystal clear for ugliness

Filed under: Culture,Thoughts — jerryamernic @ 6:41 pm

The first time my daughter saw the Michael Lee-Chin Crystal she said it looked as if an asteroid had struck the Royal Ontario Museum and got lodged in the roof. Or was it the side? I can’t remember, but then it’s hard to tell which is the roof and which is the side. Nevertheless, my daughter is a teacher and I respect her opinion.

Ever since the Crystal, as it’s called, was unveiled I kept wondering if I was the only one who thought it was hideous. But an international organization called VisualTourist has ranked the latest addition to Canada’s largest museum as no. 8 on its list of the ten ugliest buildings in the world.

As a Toronto native, I have many fond memories of the ROM. When I was a little boy, the dinosaurs were my favourite exhibit. My parents would take me, and the visit would end at the gift shop with new additions to my fossil collection. The ROM was part of my childhood.

In the ‘80s, I wrote for a magazine called Key to Toronto. The October 1982 issue had my piece about the ROM’s ongoing renovations – a new curatorial centre and new terrace galleries, including an expanded reptile gallery. These renovations comprised the second major makeover for the ROM, and would last for years, but it was still the ROM. The ROM opened in 1912 and, as the literature says, was built in the Italianate Neo-Romanesque style with arched windows, decorative eave bracks, quoins, and cornices. This means the stone building was stately and traditional, and had a certain presence at the southwest corner of Bloor Street and Queens Park Crescent. That is a major intersection right across the street from a number of University of Toronto buildings, and near the Yorkville area with its shops, boutiques, and dining establishments.

The 1933 expansion of the ROM included the Byzantine-style rotunda with its ornate mosaic ceiling. The rotunda was the main entrance until the thing happened. Today that grandiose rotunda with the magnificent ceiling and circular structure that brought European-style classicism to a once bland North American city is largely abandoned. Instead, visitors must come through the Crystal.

Today I’m a member of the ROM and have to walk by the Crystal whenever I come to hear a lecture or see an exhibit. It was there when I took in four lectures related to the Dead Sea Scrolls exhibit. It was there when I attended a Munk Debate on aid to Africa. It’s there every time I go for a walk around Queens Park Crescent and Bloor Street.

It is a monstrosity, and not just ugly, because ugly is a simple word and this is anything but simple. It is complicated, convoluted, and con-everything that is beautiful and sensible. I used to think the ugliest building in Toronto was the John Robarts Library. The reference library for the U of T is a disjointed structure of uneven proportions, sort of a three-dimensional ink blot without the symmetry. But next to the Crystal, the Robarts Library is the Taj Mahal.

The Crystal emerges from the ground like a metallic mushroom on steroids, its lines going off in all directions with no rhyme or reason. It rises out of the sidewalk like a cancerous tumor that renders the patient into a state of comatose terminitis. The fruit-explosion muffin from Tim Hortons has nothing on this glass-aluminum asterisk that could be a freeze-frame moments after the atomic blast to end the world. Don’t tell me about its deployment of shapes and geometry or the interlocking prismatic forms that turn the entire museum complex into a luminous beacon.

The Michael Lee-Chin Crystal – and I give cudos to the guy for donating all that money – is an abomination of the worst kind when free spirits who think they’re creative go off on a tangent and drag the community down with them.

For $270 million, the powers that be at the ROM gave us the Crystal with its in-your-face, American-style ego that, for all intents and purposes, destroyed the ROM. How dare they besmirch my memories of this once beautiful edifice. So here’s my idea. Tear the thing down and start over. Millions of people, especially those in Toronto, will say thank you.

November 13, 2009

My little guy is a new dad

Filed under: Thoughts — jerryamernic @ 12:04 pm

Wasn’t it only yesterday he was throwing things off his high chair? Now he outweighs me and I’m a grandpa …

Click The Globe and Mail link below for a text and audio version.
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/life/facts-and-arguments/my-little-guy-is-a-new-dad/article1357102/739/

August 13, 2009

We are so lucky

Filed under: 1 — jerryamernic @ 1:12 pm

Sarah Palin has resigned as Governor of the great state of Alaska. She says she is off to write a book, and will be busy organizing Republicans across America. Good for her. She can now add to her ample resume of achievement. Before gaining the Republican Party nomination for Vice-President of the United States, Ms. Palin had a substantive – that’s right, substantive – track record.

For starters, she won the Miss Wasillah Beauty Pageant. No mean feat. In 1984, she took third place in the Miss Alaska Beauty Pageant, and while that might have been disappointing, she did walk away with the Miss Congeniality Award. Bet you thought Sandra Bullock won that, didn’t you? Nope. It was Sarah Palin.

In 1987, she earned a B.S. degree (not sure if that’s Bachelor of Science or just B.S.) in communication, with an emphasis on journalism, from the University of Idaho. Then, she was a sports reporter for the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman. Yes, that would be the Mat-Su Valley Frontiersman. She then eloped with her childhood sweetheart Todd, and went off to help him with his commercial fishing business.

Then she began her political career. She ran for town council in Wasilla, an Alaska town with some 5,000 residents, and defeated her opponent by 220 votes, which sounds close but really wasn’t because she got 530 votes and he got 310. Later, she was re-elected by a landslide – 413 votes to 185 – and before that term was out she became Mayor.

Along with these substantive accomplishments, she was a mother. She had five – count ’em five – children, and managed to keep her figure. And she didn’t give her kids names like John and Carol. No sir. The Palin children are named Track, Bristol, Willow, Piper, and Trig. Palin also has one grandchild, albeit this latest offspring is technically on the illegitimate side of the ledger, but hey it wasn’t the kid’s fault.

Now it’s true that when she was Governor of Alaska and on the John McCain ticket, Palin was duped by a Montreal radio host into thinking she was being interviewed by Nicolas Sarkozy, President of France. ‘Sarkozy’ asked if she would accompany him on a trip to hunt baby seals, and from what I gather, she accepted. I know this sounds hard to believe. It would be like someone running for president who thinks that the Prime Minister of Canada is John Poutine.

Couldn’t happen.

Palin once said that the U.S. military is on a mission from God, which brings to mind the very important and substantive mission that John Belushi and Dan Aykroyd were on in ‘The Blues Brothers.’

Could you imagine the state of the world if someone like Sarah Palin was president?

She is against sex education in the classroom because she favours abstinence. So, if she were president, U.S. policy on fighting AIDS in Africa would be against the promotion of condoms. Speaking of Africa, she didn’t know that it was a continent. But that’s OK because she is up on international relations since Alaska is between Russia and Canada. She said so in that famous interview with Katie Couric.

Sarah Palin is an avid, evangelical fundamentalist who favours teaching creationism in public schools, and is against abortion in any circumstance, even for a young rape victim.

If such a person was in the Oval Office, what would happen to America’s leadership role in science? The nation that brought us the automobile, the airplane, the computer, the Internet, what have you, would be against stem cell research. If Sarah Palin were president, the AAAS (American Association for the Advancement of Science) would be turning over in its grave, and this organization is still alive.

There is no doubt that a U.S. president with the mind-set of Sarah Palin would advance the agenda of the Christian right, and the U.S. – and the entire world – would be left in a pickle.

We’re lucky she resigned.

June 17, 2009

The Passion Pit

Filed under: 1 — jerryamernic @ 8:53 am

I went to a debate the other night and saw something I don’t see every day. Passion. It was the Munk Debate on Foreign Aid, and the four speakers certainly knew their stuff. Arguing in favour of foreign aid were Stephen Lewis who is the former UN Special Envoy for HIV/AIDS in Africa, and Paul Collier, economics professor and Director of the Centre for the Study of African Economies at Oxford University. Arguing against were Dambisa Moyo, a native of Zambia and author of the book Dead Aid, and Peruvian economist Hernando De Soto.

I got intrigued after reading about Moyo and her book in the newspaper a few days before the debate. A couple calls later and I had a pair of tickets.

Regardless where one stands on the issue, there was no doubt that the four people up on that stage were passionate about the subject.

I had met Stephen Lewis a long time ago when I was a reporter and he was on the hustings during an Ontario election campaign. I remember being somewhat taken with him. He was articulate, polite, and actually seemed to believe in what he was saying – a most unusual trait for a politician.

I have read his book Race Against Time, which is about AIDS in Africa, and his passion and love for that continent came through loud and clear. I have also heard his lengthy interview with the CBC’s Shelagh Rogers about this issue, and the passion was there again. As expected, Lewis did not disappoint in the Munk Debate. He shared a podium with A-list speaker/intellectuals and probably came out as the most passionate of the group. He also showed a sense of humour when he said he’s a socialist and, as a consequence of that, knows a thing or two about theory not working in practice.

Dambisa Moyo, who holds a Doctorate in economics from Oxford University and a Masters from Harvard, is no slouch. She feels that the West is far too paternalistic in its treatment of her native continent, that aid is largely wasted and misdirected, and that it works against African prosperity. She, too, exhibited passion.

Hernando De Soto is president of Peru’s Institute for Liberty and Democracy, which is from what I gather one of the world’s top think tanks. While some of his remarks were over the heads of those who aren’t economists, it was abundantly clear that he possesses a social conscience. Economists are not normally regarded as the most passionate among us, but he acquitted himself well.

Paul Collier is a professor and curiously enough, a former teacher of Ms. Moyo. He is a very knowledgeable man to be sure, but somewhat lacking in colour. However, he wasn’t lacking in candour at the debate.

Passion can be an elusive commodity. Unless one is a skilled actor, it’s hard to fake, although a great many try. If you have it, everyone will know. Barack Obama, an intellectual and a masterful orator, has it but it’s not the type of passion that exudes in the way that a volcano exudes molten lava. His is a more cerebral kind of passion.

During the primaries leading up to the U.S. election, Hillary Clinton didn’t demonstrate a whole lot of passion. She did exhibit all the traits of a professional politician who is up on the issues, but aside from one appearance when she shed a tear or two, I didn’t see much emotion. There may have been more from John McCain, but he also came across as overly rehearsed.

What about Canada? Up here we have lots of opportunistic politicians – aren’t all politicians opportunists? – but I think it’s safe to say that our current batch of leaders is a passion-less bunch. On the passion barometer, every one of them is hopeless.

Stephen Harper is nobody’s fool – even if he has abandoned many of his conservative principles in order to try to govern this country – but the word ‘passion’ doesn’t come to mind when one mentions his name. If he has any, it’s well hidden behind his carefully crafted Key Messages.

Michael Ignatieff? The man comes across as stilted, scripted, arrogant, and boring, so boring in fact that he must have graduated summa cum laude from the Robert Stanfield Institute of Excitement. In other words, he is your classic Canadian politician.

Jack Layton I remember well from his days as a Toronto councillor when he was vehemently anti-police, anti-business, and pro-revolution. A modern-day Che Guevera, if you will, but without the passion. His offering, I am afraid, is so rehearsed as to come off as insincere.

What about Gilles Duceppe? He is yet another who tries his best to fake passion, but fails. And since we’re on the subject, remember former Liberal Leader Stephane Dion trying to portray anger in front of a TV camera?

Pitiful.

Hundreds of people, among them scores of Toronto’s glitterati society, attended the Munk Debate on Foreign Aid. When it was over, organizers brought out the gourmet foods, wine, and freebies like 10-inch tin cans full of “irresistibly smooth milk chocolate,” courtesy of the Swiss. It all went down very nicely, thank you, but hey, this was about aid to Africa, wasn’t it?

Nevertheless, the speakers were impressive. They showed knowledge and, for the most part, passion. Stephen Lewis especially. Now wasn’t he a politician at one time? I believe he was. Unfortunately, it was the wrong party.

May 8, 2009

Numbskulls, Hooligans and Losers – Welcome to the NHL

Filed under: Sports — jerryamernic @ 12:14 pm

It’s springtime, the Toronto Maple Leafs are again out of the Stanley Cup playoffs, and the powers-that-be who run the National Hockey League are eyeing the next stop on hockey’s long-time mission to conquer the United States. The destination? Las Vegas, which is where the NHL Awards show will be held next month.

Hockey in Las Vegas makes as much sense as it does in Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta, or any number of other U.S. cities where the culture of hockey is non-existent. Curiously enough, NHL franchises in Phoenix, Nashville, Atlanta and the like teeter on the brink. The one in Phoenix, of course, has filed for bankruptcy, despite the league throwing in millions to try and keep the leaky ship afloat.

Ever since the NHL expanded in 1967, it’s been under the illusion that hockey matters in the U.S. I’m surprised that those Americans who run the NHL don’t grant a franchise to General Motors or make Obama Chairman of the Board in Phoenix and have the U.S. taxpayer rescue “an essential industry.” That would make as much sense as everything else they’ve done over the years.

Back in 1982, I wrote a piece for The Financial Post Magazine called ‘Is Hockey Healthy?’ The NHL had just absorbed four teams from the rival World Hockey Association (WHA), an upstart league that had signed such NHL stars as Bobby Hull and Gordie Howe – and for one season a 17-year-old phenom named Wayne Gretzky – and had raided and decimated several NHL teams, the Toronto Maple Leafs among them. With the WHA gone, good times were supposed to be here again. The NHL, in its wisdom, was again eyeing the huge U.S. market with its millions of sports fans and potentially huge TV revenues.

For that article, which was a financial look at the NHL, I interviewed several NHL owners, including Harold Ballard of the Maple Leafs, Peter Pocklington of the Edmonton Oilers, and Ed Snider of the Philadelphia Flyers. Snider impressed me because of his honesty. He said the league didn’t have any central planning, its marketing was awful, unlike other major sports leagues the teams shared nothing which resulted in have and have-not franchises, and this gem: “In the U.S. we are considered a fringe operation.” He also said Ballard was bad for the game.

As for Pocklington, he said the league had installed franchises in American cities where they didn’t have a hope. I later mentioned this to then NHL Commissioner John Zeigler, who promptly blew up at me over the phone and went ballistic.

It’s now 2009 and little has changed. Ballard and Snider have both passed on, and Pocklington was recently arrested in California on charges of bankruptcy fraud, which makes him the latest in a long line NHL men who got into trouble with authorities. The list includes the aforementioned Harold Ballard and his Maple Leafs partner Stafford Smythe, one-time NHL Commissioner Clarence Campbell, former Los Angeles Kings owner Bruce McNall, former players union president Alan Eagleson, and such owners as John Rigas of the Buffalo Sabres, Henry Samueli of the Anaheim Ducks, and William Del Biaggio III of both the San Jose Sharks and Nashville Predators.

Aside from the fact that a number of crooked fingers have been stuck into the NHL over the years, the league has been plagued by this so-called ‘vision’ of American millionaires and billionaires who think the future of pro hockey is to be found in the United States. The list of failed, and in some cases still struggling, U.S. franchises would fill a page in National Geographic: Oakland Seals, Atlanta Flames, Kansas City Scouts, Cleveland Barons, Colorado Rockies, Hartford Whalers, Carolina Hurricanes, Phoenix Coyotes, Nashville Predators, Columbus Blue Jackets, to name a few.

Franchises in such cities as Pittsburgh would have moved long ago if they didn’t land superstars Mario Lemieux and, more recently, Sidney Crosby. And even Original Six stalwarts such as Boston and Chicago were in serious trouble until their team’s on-ice fortunes turned around. The NHL has planted and supplanted franchises in U.S. cities where the game has no tradition, little if any following, no understanding, and no appreciation. It would be like putting a multi-million-dollar cricket operation in Montreal. But the league has done this over and over again.

Consider this. New York City and environs, with a population of about 15 million people, has three NHL hockey teams – the New York Rangers, New York Islanders, and New Jersey Devils. The Greater Toronto Area, with a population of about 5 million, has one – the Toronto Maple Leafs. If we used simple math, that 3:1 ratio might make sense, but it doesn’t make sense because when the number of hockey fans is the measuring stick, there is no comparison.

How about Southern California? It also has three teams – the Los Angeles Kings, San Jose Sharks, and Mighty Ducks of Anaheim. Does Southern California have more hockey fans than the GTA, or better still, than Southern Ontario? Of course not. It’s not even close.

The biggest hockey market in the world is Toronto. The arena is always full and the team always makes buckets of money even when the product stinks. Forbes Magazine penned the value of the team at $448 million U.S., making it the NHL’s richest team, despite having the highest ticket prices in the league and not winning the Stanley Cup since 1967.

Today it’s front-page news all over Canada that Jim Balsillie, billionaire co-founder of Research In Motion (RIM), has put in an offer to buy the now bankrupt Phoenix Coyotes and move the franchise to Southern Ontario. You can rest assured that NHL President Gary Bettman will fight tooth and nail to prevent that from happening.

Former Philadelphia Flyers owner Ed Snider was right. In the U.S., the NHL is not only fringe, but is regarded as little more than a circus. In Canada, however, the game is entrenched in the country’s culture and psyche. Neither of these things will ever change. And now the NHL is taking its awards show to Las Vegas, probably with the hope of landing a franchise.

Roll the dice.

April 1, 2009

Creating an argument, but in reverse

Filed under: politics,Religion — jerryamernic @ 10:11 am

Many years ago I wrote for Quest Magazine. The lead story in the April 1982 issue was my piece on The Creation Debate. On the cover was a microscope, a pair of eyeglasses, and two books – the Holy Bible, and The Origin of Species by Charles Darwin. To do the story, I interviewed the curator of Vertebrate Palaeontology at the Royal Ontario Museum, president of the Ontario chapter of Creation Science, university professors of geology, zoology and other disciplines, a high-school science teacher, a bureaucrat with the Ontario Ministry of Education, scientist David Suzuki, and a creationist with 100 Huntley Street.

I looked at that article the other day, and two quotes jumped out. One was from Suzuki. I had told him about an August 1980 Gallup Poll in the U.S. which said 40% of American adults believed in the literal interpretation of the Bible. Suzuki said, “I don’t believe it.” The other quote was from the creationist, and here’s what he said: “If you believe in evolution, then there was no man Adam, so you must deny the original sin, so you don’t need redemption and don’t need a redeemer, which denies Jesus as our Savior.”

He couldn’t buy into evolution because of his religious convictions. Was there any science at work here? No, because he started with a conclusion and fit his life to that. Which brings me to Gary Goodyear, the Cambridge, Ontario chiropractor who is Canada’s Minister of State for Science and Technology.

The first time a reporter asked Goodyear if he believed in evolution, he refused to answer on the grounds that he is a Christian. He said asking him about his religion was inappropriate. A few days later he was on TV, was asked the same question, said of course he believes in evolution, then gave a long-winded diatribe that didn’t make much sense.

Apparently, Canada’s Minister of State for Science and Technology is a creationist. Some people think there’s nothing wrong with that, but I’m not one of them. I don’t care what anyone believes, but a creationist sure as hell shouldn’t be Minister of State for Science and Technology. That would be like installing the last CEO of AIG as Minister of Finance, a beer-swilling potbelly as Minister of Sport, or a free-school advocate who disapproves of grades, tests, and curriculum as Minister of Education. But a creationist as Minister of Science? I could see George W. Bush making an appointment like that, but am surprised at Stephen Harper. It once again shows that Cabinet appointments in Canada have nothing to do with suitability for a portfolio, and everything to do with politics. Speaking of Bush, after being elected President, he was asked about evolution and said, “Well, the jury’s still out on that one.”

It is?

Twenty-seven years ago David Suzuki was wrong to so casually dismiss the results of that U.S. Gallup Poll. He was wrong because this ain’t no small group. From time to time I have spoken to those who fervently believe that the earth is a few thousand years old. Some of them have university degrees. They painstakingly build an argument that creationism deserves as much face time as the ‘theory’ of evolution, and say it should be taught in our schools. They are totally off base because creationism is about religion, and that’s all it’s about. It has nothing to do with science. Likewise, evolution has nothing to do with religion, and has only to do with science.

Exploring the origins of mankind is sensitive ground for some of those who claim to know God, but apparently, many Americans know Him. A recent Gallup Poll said only 39% of them believe in evolution, while another Gallup Poll said one-third of Americans believe the Bible to be literally true. (I’m surprised it wasn’t higher.) But then this also depends on who does the polling and who reports the results.

For example, the National Center for Science Education, which “defends the teaching of evolution in public schools,” said 58% of Canadians accept evolution, while 22% think God created humans in their present form within the last 10,000 years. On the other hand, a Canadian Press-Decima Research Poll said 34% of Canadians go for evolution, and 26% opt for God-made human beings of recent vintage. That still leaves a whopping 40% out of the picture, but was good enough for the Canadian Catholic News to report on it this way: ‘Poll shows Canadians divided on role God played in human creation.’

This was their spin on things. When one reports on polls, of course, it’s all about spin, and two groups particularly good with spin are politicians and creationists.

Those with unbridled faith in religion – whatever the religion – will never present a cogent argument on this subject. They can’t. They are too grounded in religious fervour and dogma to look at it intellectually. Just go back to that 100 Huntley creationist quote from my 1982 Quest Magazine story: “If you believe in evolution, then there was no man Adam, so you must deny the original sin, so you don’t need redemption and don’t need a redeemer, which denies Jesus as our Savior.”

Thus, evolution must be false since it goes against everything this man was taught at Sunday school. But I have news for him. Ever since Darwin’s 1859 revelation, there hasn’t been one shred of evidence, apart from religious belief, to support creationism. Likewise, in the past 150 years, the evidence supporting evolution is a slam dunk; if evolution isn’t a fact, then the earth might as well be flat, and the sun might as well revolve us.

Here is one final quote to mull over: ‘There is grandeur in this view of life, with its several powers, having been breathed by the Creator into a few forms or one; and that, whilst this planet has gone cycling on according to the fixed laws of gravity, from so simple a beginning, endless forms most beautiful and most wonderful have been, and are being, evolved.’

Who said that? Why, Charles Darwin in The Origin of Species.

March 5, 2009

Class and Ass Athletes

Filed under: Sports — jerryamernic @ 5:29 pm

In 1992 I was writing my novel Gift of the Bambino, which is about a young boy and his grandfather, and how they are connected by baseball. The novel has a lot to do with Babe Ruth and baseball in the old days. While doing my research, I attended a reunion of the Lizzies, which was an organization of boys’ baseball and basketball teams in Toronto throughout the first half of the 20thcentury. My own father was a member of the Lizzies in the 1930s.

Perhaps 200 men attended that dinner reception, most of them old-timers. I sat down at a table, and began talking with the man next to me, who immediately asked what someone my age was doing at the reunion. The Lizzies, after all, had disbanded in 1946. The man was none other than Goody Rosen, who would pass away a couple years later, but to this day I am eternally grateful for that chance meeting with him.

Rosen was the first Canadian to play in a major-league All-Star game, which happened in 1945 when he hit .325 for the New York Giants and was the third leading hitter in the National League. He had arrived in the majors in 1937 as a rookie with the Brooklyn Dodgers. The first-base coach for the Dodgers that year was George Herman ‘Babe’ Ruth.

The Bambino, the Sultan of Swat, the greatest power hitter baseball has ever known, had retired as a player in 1935, but two years later the Dodgers brought him back as their first-base coach. And Goody Rosen proceeded to tell me all about Babe Ruth, who believe it or not had the locker right next to him in the Dodgers’ dressing room.

I whipped out a pen and started taking notes, and believe me, I couldn’t write fast enough. Rosen told me he had been entrusted with keeping Ruth’s humidor, which encased the Babe’s precious cigars.

“I understand he was quite a rabble-rouser,” I said.

“Yes he was,” said Rosen. “He was a good person though.”

And he was. When you write historical fiction and spend far too many hours doing research, you learn a lot about your subject. Today, I consider myself something of a Babe Ruth aficionado.

Ruth hit his first pro home run as a minor-leaguer with the AAA Providence Grays in Toronto on September 5th, 1914, and that home run was central to my novel. A couple years ago, I organized an event at Hanlan’s Point on the Toronto islands to unveil a plaque commemorating that achievement. The New York Yankees were in town to play the Blue Jays, and both teams were represented at the unveiling. We also had Ruth’s grandson Tom Stevens on hand.

I remember when Hank Aaron passed Ruth in 1974 to become baseball’s career, home-run champion. Ruth finished his career with 714 round-trippers, and Aaron would finish with 755. Hank Aaron has always been a consummate gentleman, a humble superstar who hit 30 or 40 home runs every season for over 20 years. It was an ugly stain for baseball when Aaron, a black man, received death threats because he dared to best the most famous record in sport. But he handled that the way he handled everything – with guts and class. Still, as good as Aaron was, he couldn’t come close to Ruth as a power hitter; witness the extra4,000 at-bats it took for him to better Ruth’s mark.

I have done many interviews about Babe Ruth and baseball, and like to say how Ruth was a man who hit all those home runs withperformance-diminishing substances. Like alcohol. It’s true. For most of his career, he smoked, drank too much, never paid attention to all the junk he ate, and wasn’t one for the gym. Indeed, one wonders how many home runs he might have hit had he taken care of himself. And maybe he wouldn’t have died at 53.

Today, baseball is badly diseased. It might even be terminal. Alex Rodriguez, better known as A-Rod, was until recently seen as the great hope who would one day replace the stigma of Barry Bonds as baseball’s all-time, home run king. But as everyone knows now, Rodriguez has admitted that when he was with the Texas Rangers he was on steroids. He had to admit it, because it’s been established that he did, in fact, take them.

No one has ever accused Alex Rodriguez of being a class act. He’s not. He’s just another in a long line of spoiled, obnoxious athletes. They seem to come off an assembly line. Perhaps zillion-dollar contracts have that effect.

Barry Bonds is another. He passed Aaron in 2007, and wound up with 762 homers. From my vantage point as a sports fan and writer, this man is unquestionably the most obnoxious athlete I have ever seen. The son of former San Francisco giants star Bobby Bonds, he spent his boyhood hanging around the likes of Willie Mays and Willie McCovey, which isn’t a shabby start if you want to be a ballplayer.

Bonds was to appear in a U.S. court on March 2nd, but his trial has now been postponed at least until July. He may wind up behind bars for lying about his alleged steroid use when appearing before a Grand Jury, and I for one won’t lose any sleep if he goes to jail. But if perjury is the crime, it better be a big cell. He could one day be joined by Alex Rodriguez, Mark McGwire, Sammy Sosa, and even a few pitchers with names like Roger Clemens.

What is the (sports) world coming to? When my son was growing up, he idolized Wayne Gretzky. If #99 had ever been connected to drugs, the kid would have been crushed. During his heyday with the Edmonton Oilers, Gretzky once volunteered to be the official spokesman for an anti-drug organization. He said he would gladly take a drug test every day of the week. I wrote a newspaper column about that, and praised him. A couple weeks later a letter arrived from the Edmonton Oilers. It was from Gretzky, who thanked me for the article.

Babe Ruth and Goody Rosen wouldn’t be impressed with what is going on now. Something tells me Hank Aaron isn’t either. There are really only two kinds of pro athletes – class and ass. Today there are too many of the latter.

February 24, 2009

Why Pope Benedict should lay low

Filed under: Religion — jerryamernic @ 1:39 am

(Posted in the ‘Full Comment’ Section of the National Post Online Edition, February 11, 2009)

The late Karol Wojtyla, better known as Pope John Paul II, was a man of courage and charisma, who stood up to the might of the Soviet Union and the Communist world, and who tried to improve relations of the Roman Catholic Church with other religions. Yes, he was deeply mired in age-old dogma that his institution is famous for, but he left much on the positive side of the ledger.

There is a story about him that many people may not know. In 1943, a Polish couple by the name of Jachowicz took in a two-year-old, Jewish boy whose parents would later perish in the Holocaust. Mrs. Jachowicz was a devout Catholic. She went to see a young parish priest, told him about the boy, and asked that he be baptised. The priest, none other than Wojtyla, asked what the boys’ parents had wanted. Mrs. Jachowicz said that their last request upon handing over their infant son was that he be told of his Jewish origins, and returned to his people if they died. Well, Wojtyla refused to do the baptism. He said it would be unfair to baptise him while there was still hope that his relatives might take him when the war is over. In fact, that little boy did survive, and was eventually reunited with relatives in the United States.

Which brings me to the current pope. How many people, especially non Catholics, recognize the name of Benedict XVI? His name isn’t nearly as familiar as that of John Paul II, which is probably a good thing. The current pope would do better to lay low.

An ugly story has reared its head in the Vatican. Richard Williamson is a British bishop who denies that six million Jews were killed by the Nazis. He was recently interviewed on Swedish TV, and said as much. Williamson is one of four members of the Society of St. Pius X. In 1988, these four men were excommunicated by the Church when they were ordained as bishops without the permission of the pope, namely John Paul II. Two weeks ago, the Vatican announced that it would lift these excommunications.

Williamson has gone on the record praising Ernst Zundel, who was the world’s leading publisher of historical revisionism, which is a nice way of saying the Holocaust was a hoax. It does Canadians proud to know that Zundel’s base was Toronto, where he lived from 1958 to 2000. He was eventually deported to Germany, and in 2007, a German court sentenced him to five years in prison. That never would have happened here, where freedom to incite hatred and discrimination is one that got away from our law-makers. In Canada, Zundel was found guilty by two juries, but later acquitted by the Supreme Court because his right to freedom of expression was said to have been violated by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

But I digress. Back in the 1980’s, after Zundel’s first trial in Canada was declared invalid, it was announced that there would be a second. At the time, I had a weekly column in the Sunday edition of the Toronto Sun. I wrote a piece saying how disgusting it was that Holocaust survivors would once again have to march into the courtroom to explain that they really were Holocaust survivors. That prompted a letter to me from a neo-Nazi. He said, and I remember this well, that Zundel is “a friend of mine and people who *** around with my friends wind up accident-prone.”

We got the police involved, and they charged him with making a threat. He was picked up, thrown into the cooler, and a hearing was held. The guy already had a criminal record, but had never been incarcerated. This is Canada, remember. To make matters worse, police found weapons in his apartment – guns, a slingshot with metal pellets, and a night scope, which is what you put on a rifle so you can see in the dark. At the hearing, the judge asked me to read the column I had written into the record. I did, and the judge said it was “very controversial.” When it was all over, the charges were dropped, and the neo-Nazi was let go, but ordered not to write letters to any newspapers for a year.

Pretty tough, huh?

I don’t have much sympathy for Nazis or Holocaust deniers. The term ‘Holocaust denier’ may not sound as bad as ‘Nazi,’ but show me a Holocaust denier who isn’t an idiot and an anti-Semite, and I’ll try to rationalize the legitimacy of the Flat Earth Society for you.

Where in the world does Pope Benedict XVI get off trying to reverse the excommunication of a member of his Church who denies the Holocaust? He now says that Williamson must recent his denial of the Holocaust in order to serve in the Church. Sorry, but it’s a little late.

Frankly, I don’t take much stock with the current leader of the Holy See. Not long after succeeding John Paul II, he created a firestorm when he made a speech implying that Islam could be equated with violence. He once said that American Indians secretly longed to be Christians. He has said that Orthodox churches were defective, and that other Christian denominations were not true churches. Before becoming pope, he said that Catholicism was the only true religion.

As a young boy in Germany, Joseph Ratzinger was a member of the Hitler Youth. For this, he shouldn’t have to apologize. He had no choice in the matter. But for all his statements and mis-statements before and especially since becoming Pope, he has a lot to apologize for. The mess with Bishop or non-bishop Williamson is merely the latest fiasco.

We should not treat Holocaust deniers lightly. Unfortunately, Canada’s record in this regard stinks, as does its record with Nazis who came here after the war. Why is this such an important issue? I’ll tell you.

“Never again” is a worthy and honourable mantra for the human race to profess, but we should not be optimistic about the future being free of such catastrophes. The biggest culprit isn’t even those who deny the past. The biggest culprit is something else within far too many of us. And that is complacency.

January 14, 2009

Monkey see, monkey do

Filed under: politics — jerryamernic @ 3:30 am

Now that George W. is going, and an intelligent, articulate man is assuming the presidency, we can expect Canada’s latte crowd to soften on the anti-U.S. rhetoric, which reached epic proportions in recent years. But Bush aside, there is little justification for such anti-Americanism in this country. After all, the United States is a democracy and we aren’t. Not really. Consider how the two countries choose their political leaders.

Barak Obama has been subjected to nothing short of an ultra-marathon on his way to the U.S. presidency. He was first elected to the Illinois senate in 1996, was re-elected in 1998, and in 2004 was elected as the junior Senator from Illinois to serve in Washington. But even then his profile was low. In July of 2004, he delivered the keynote address at the Democratic National Convention, and sprang into the limelight where he has been ever since. In February of 2007, he announced his bid to run for the presidency, and few gave him much of a chance. And that was when the marathon began.

Out of a field of candidates vying for the Democratic nomination, the race was soon narrowed down to two – Obama and Hillary Clinton – and even then Clinton was seen as the front runner. But the U.S. system of primaries exposes would-be national leaders to a level of scrutiny that doesn’t exist anywhere else, certainly not in Canada, where the way we pick leaders is closer to how they do things in Russia.

Who had ever heard of Vladimir Putin until Boris Yeltsin announced that he wanted him to be his successor? Before you know it, Putin was the next leader of Russia. After his eight-year term ran out, he made himself Prime Minister, so he’s still handling the reins of power, albeit, along with another appointee named Dmitry Medvedev serving as President. Would either of these men opt for a U.S.-type system of primaries, enabling everyday Russians to get a good look at them and their policies? I think not. That would be too democratic.

Likewise for Canada. We don’t elect our leaders at all. It’s more accurate to say that we appoint them, or better still, have them appointed for us by power brokers. Michael Ignatieff is the latest example.

Today, he stands a good chance of becoming our next prime minister. On his way to assuming the leadership of one of our two main political parties, what kind of scrutiny was he subjected to by the Canadian people, outside of running as an M.P. in his own riding? Somewhere between not much and nothing.

Let’s forget for a moment that Ignatieff is yet another professor. Let’s also forget that he left Canada over 30 years ago and has lived most of his life south of the border where he taught at Harvard. He returned and announced that he wanted to be the next Liberal leader. He ran, and lost to Stephane Dion, who for the next two years showed how not to be a national leader.

Then came last fall’s federal election, the Harper tactic to cut public funding of political parties, and the now infamous coalition, in which Ignatieff wisely kept to the sidelines. When it became apparent that the hapless Dion, whose party had just been rejected by three-quarters of Canada’s electorate, could become Prime Minister, even the most diehard Liberals realized that this country’s political machinations had stooped to a new low. Parliament was – I hate this word – prorogued, the Liberal leadership convention was cancelled, and Ignatieff was declared/appointed Liberal Leader.

Some democracy, eh?

I know that the U.S. presidential election of 2000 was stolen, which further inspired the Canadian Left to jump on that as an illustration of the evil dictatorship south of the border. But I would argue that all our elections are stolen.

While the U. S. presidential election is a long, drawn-out affair, it does give the American public an insight into who wants to be president. It exposes their face, their words, their policies, their flaws, even their hometown preachers who may have said a few things they shouldn’t have.

Is there any chance of Canada adopting a U.S.-type system of primaries, which would subject aspiring national leaders to intense scrutiny? No. Why not? Well, Canadians wouldn’t endure the pain for very long. We get sick and tired of things after a four-week election campaign. Apathy would win out, and before you know it no one would be appearing at those rallies.

The fact is that, recessions aside, we are an extremely fortunate people who just aren’t used to real democracy. A banana republic, but without the republic. Oh yes, and Happy New Year.

December 5, 2008

Jim Davidson Motors

Filed under: Thoughts — jerryamernic @ 4:08 pm

There are several routes I take when I go jogging, and most of them lead through Jim Davidson Motors. Jim Davidson is at the corner of my street and has been a fixture here since 1949. My family is a relative newcomer by that standard, since we arrived only in 1980.

During just about any time of year, except for winter – I’m not crazy – you’ll find me running along our street in the late afternoon shortly before the dinner hour. After limbering up in the driveway, I either head north and hit the old Dodge-Chrysler dealership in about a minute and a half, and then do anything up to a 45-minute run, or go south towards the lake and visit Jim Davidson on the way back.

How many times I’ve run by the service department, and cut through the hordes of cars and vans, I have no idea. Over the years I’ve probably done a marathon just running through Jim Davidson. Today, however, there are no more new vehicles on the lot. Why? Jim Davidson has gone belly up. All that’s left is something called Canada Motor Car Co., which sells used cars. This company once shared the used-car lot with Jim Davidson, but now they’re going it alone.

It’s a sign of the times.

My Dad was a salesman who put 50,000 miles a year on his car. That’s right. Miles. He always drove a GM product, usually a Pontiac, but sometimes a Buick. Not in a million years would he have considered a foreign car, and he bought a new car every three years or so.

In the ‘60s the Japanese arrived big-time and ‘Made in Japan’ was synonymous for junk, especially in terms of automobiles. But their cars improved, and in the ‘70s and ‘80s, they kept taking bigger and bigger bites out of the domestic auto market. Even then, my father would never have considered buying a foreign car. The mere notion of it left a bad taste in his mouth.

It’s funny how times have changed. At our house, you’ll find a late-model Honda Accord, which is for my wife and me. I bought it used, privately, last summer which is how I buy all my cars now. Two or three years old, low mileage, still on warranty. Nothing to do with dealers. Lots of people say I’m crazy but my last car, a 1994 Mazda MX6, I drove for 11 years. The one before that, a 1984 Honda Prelude, I drove for ten. Without question, that Prelude was the best car I ever had. Ten years and not a single thing ever went wrong with it. Our daughter, who is a teacher, is at home and drives a 2006 Honda Civic, which she bought new.

We don’t have any problems with these cars.

Which brings us to the current global financial crisis, which according to the CEO’s of GM, Chrysler and Ford, is responsible for the Big Three requiring an emergency bailout of $25 billion from US taxpayers and who knows how much from Canadian taxpayers for their Canadian subsidiaries. The government can’t let them die, we are told, because so many jobs and spinoff industries would die with them.

I find something very un-American and anti-free enterprise about this whole concept. If you run a business and nobody wants to buy your product, then the government will bail you out. Is that how this continent developed an economy that became the envy of the world?

I have no doubt that America, and Canada along with it, will bounce back from the current economic doldrums. It might be painful and it might take longer than we’d like, but it will happen. But it won’t happen if we adopt the kind of attitude that the CEO’s of GM, Ford and Chrysler are taking.

Let’s face the facts. General Motors – at one time the proudest, biggest, and most arrogant company in the world – has become a loser, and that’s putting it mildly. They, with Ford and Chrysler, have repeatedly fought against better, greener, more fuel-efficient cars, choosing instead to make inefficient gas guzzlers that come with higher profit margins. Even when the writing was on the wall, they continued to adopt this dinosaur mentality. Today, GM, the former no. 1, isn’t so proud and isn’t so big. Yet, it remains as arrogant as ever.

Witness the Big Three CEO’s flying off to Washington in their corporate jets – they didn’t even jet-pool to share the load! – and asking for their handouts. And appearing before the Senate banking committee and blaming their current dilemma on the “global financial crisis.” Truly, such arrogance knows no bounds.

Fact. The former biggest automaker in the world wrote the book on planned obsolescence, and sunk its tentacles into consumers like my own father for decades. Once upon a time, there wasn’t really a choice. Fact. Today there is, and as wanna-be President John McCain recently observed, the people have spoken.

I’m going to miss running through Jim Davidson Motors. When the site is occupied by Toyota or Honda or maybe some European or even a Chinese manufacturer, it won’t be the same. The cars will definitely be smaller. But rest assured that the consumer will be considerably more discerning about what they buy and don’t buy.

Ford tough? I don’t think so.

Next Page »

Blog at WordPress.com.